Merge [structure] into [sentence-structure]? What about [constructs]?

Question

It seems to me that these tags are about the same thing. The dominant tag is sentence-structure with 243 questions and a tag wiki excerpt:

Questions concerning the types of words and phrases which are grouped and ordered meaningfully to express a statement, question, or another type of sentence

The tag structure has 19 questions and no tag wiki, all of which look like focusing on sentence structure:

• How can I ask "which one is your favorite/do you like more"?
• Are the sentences 这个杯子有一点儿水 and 一点儿水在杯子里 correct?
• Correction of 我在饭店里把晚饭吃了
• Is 靠 structure "A 靠 B do something"?
• 褒贬句 In chinese language
• 好 vs 住 (in resultative complement)
• How do form "You can borrow the book once [it's returned / C returns in]" in Chinese?
• How do form this sentence "I want (object) to (verb/be) that..." in Chinese?
• Is '我还需要多加练习' okay as a dance video caption?
• What does the '头' in '头一次遇到' mean?
• Has anybody heard of 嵌套结构(nested structure)? The dictionary I use lists 中 as it instead of 单一结构
• Give further examples of morphological alternation patterns such as Verb/Noun (处 chu3 / chu4) and Active/Inactive Verb (好 hao4 / hao3)
• What contributes to negative emotion / sentiment in this example?
• When will we use 来 and 到 after a verb?
• Can I use 完 after all verb to say finish doing activities?
• when will we use 没(mei3) and 不(bu4) before verb in sentences?
• MacOS Keyboard with Predictive Completion produces 心情舒暢
• How to say "we want what is best for our kids"?
• When should 了 be after the verb and when should it be at the end of the sentence?

The difference between [sentence-structure] and [structure] doesn't seem meaningful enough to me. Are there other entities with structure that are not sentences, and that aren't more appropriately covered by another tag?

---

The other tag constructs has 7 questions, and no tag wiki:

• Sentence construction with 除了, 被，一方面
• 了 vs 是...的 as "factuality markers"
• Is this email correct grammatically and structurally?
• Lists and Conjunctions
• What is the term for alluding to a more formless concept by listing its specific members?
• When is a degree required? or: hai6 vs hou2 vs gei
• MSM equivalent of 倒...不... or 半...不... construct?

After further examination, this tag may have its own specific and correct meaning, as in "grammatical constructions":

a group of words that form a constituent of a sentence and are considered as a single unit;

For example ”是～的“，“快～了”, etc. So this tag might be fine, but:

1. it's almost unused
2. I wonder if it isn't adequately represented by grammar

Edit: proposed [structure] -> [sentence-structure] synonym

Answer 1

For structure, I edited many of these manually. The structure was sometimes used for other things, like complement, or even just used seemingly at random.

After checking, I merged the remaining structure questions into sentence-structure. I don't intend to create a synonym, as other aspects of Chinese also have structure (e.g. paragraph structure, character structure). [It might be worth blacklisting the structure tag, since it's rather vague (I haven't done this).]

For constructs, I edited some of these manually (there's still a few which can be edited away). I'm not quite sure what to do with this one:

• Modern Standard Mandarin equivalent of the 倒...不... and 半...不... constructs?

But generally, if constructs refers to "grammar constructs" then it can be reasonably tagged grammar together with a more specific tag that describes the kind of construct (e.g. particles, sentence-structure).