The process of tracking development of new site features is very unclear.
Other related questions:
- Who decides if a suggested feature is site-worthy?
- Who implements the different suggestions that are deemed site-worthy?
- How/Where are the new feature implementation being tracked if at all?
- If none of the process is in-place, of what value is it to make site feature suggestions?
Assuming nothing exists, should the community not implement a vote based mechanism to have new features applied to the site?